AERODYNAMIC TESTING

the aerodynamic resistance (N) of the IDEA rims and the DT Swiss spokes were measured at a wind speed of 15 m / s

Carbon rim IDEA C35 / T35 = 2,87 N

aero T35 C35

Carbon rim IDEA C45 / T45 = 2,65 N

aero T45 C45


Carbon rim IDEA C55 / T55 = 2,11 N

idea T55 C55


Carbon rim IDEA C80 / T80 = 1,75 N

idea T80 C80


2,2x0,9 (Aerolite, CX-Ray) Spike = 0,65 N

aerolite


2,3x1,2 (Aerocomp) = 1,15 N

aerocomp


Spike 1,6x1,6 (Competition Race) = 2,21 N

competition race


Spike 1,8x1,8 (Competition) = 2,55 N

competiton

Results of aerodynamic testing of rims and spokes

aerodynamically efficient IDEA carbon rims

Model Aerodynamic resistance Lateral strength Axial strength
IDEA T35 / C35 2,87 N 10,54mm

5,42mm

IDEA T45 / C45 2,65 N 9,83mm 2,83mm
IDEA T55 / C55 2,11 N 9,31mm 1,82mm
IDEA T80 / C80 1,75 N 8,91mm 0,75mm


Aerodynamic rim testing confirmed that the higher the rim profile, the lower the drag. You can also see the turbulence that forms behind the rim creating resistance (N). In terms of aerodynamic drag and strength, the IDEA T45 / C45 rim model achieves the best result.

For the construction of road bikes, we recommend combining medium-high 35 / 45mm rim profiles with the DT Swiss AeroComp or DT Swiss Competition spikes. For thinner models of spokes, it is necessary to count with lower strength (recommended for riders up to 75 kg).

For time trial models, the IDEA T55 / T80 combination is optimal.


Model Aerodynamic resistance Lateral strength Axial strength
2,2x0,9 (Aerolite CX-Ray) 0,61 N 18,56mm 7,55mm
2,3x1,2 (Aerocomp) 1,15 N 14,22mm 5,08mm
1,8x1,8 2,55 N 7,71mm 7,83mm
1,6x1,6 2,21 N 9,65mm 9,94mm


Aerodynamic testing of the spokes brought an unexpected difference between the aero and the classic spike. The difference in resistance between Aerolite and Competition is up to 4.

Each of the spikes tested has its use in a given type of wheel set. Road bikes (DT Swiss Aerocomp or Aerolite). MTB bikes (DT Swiss Competition or Competition Race). Footbike (DT Swiss Competition) for maximum lateral strength.

STRESS TESTING

stress testing of IDEA rims and DT Swiss spokes

Carbon rim IDEA C35 / T35

tension T35 C35

Carbon rim IDEA C45 / T45

tension T45 C45


Carbon rim IDEA C55 / T55

tension T55 C55


Carbon rim IDEA C80 / T80

tension T80 C80


IDEA M30 carbon rim

tension M30 M30


Aluminum Sample (DT Swiss XR331)

tension alu


Spike 2,3x1,2 (Aerocomp)

tension spokes


1,8 Spike (Competition)

tension spokes2

Results of stress testing of rims and spokes

Thanks to the knowledge of individual components we are able to build wheels better than others

Model Aerodynamic resistance Lateral strength Axial strength
IDEA T35 / C35 2,87 N 10,54mm

5,42mm

IDEA T45 / C45 2,65 N 9,83mm 2,83mm
IDEA T55 / C55 2,11 N 9,31mm 1,82mm
IDEA T80 / C80 1,75 N 8,91mm 0,75mm


Carbon rims generally have high lateral and axial rigidity, however, the differences between the characteristics of each model divide the rims into the disciplines for which they are most suitable. Thanks to the resulting numbers we are able to adapt the wheel sets to your weight, dispicpine and type of use.

We also compared the IDEA M30 rim with the aluminum rim (ALU specimen). The difference in lateral and axial strength was up to 4, which only proves that the main benefit of carbon rims in addition to weight is high strength.


Model Aerodynamic resistance Lateral strength Axial strength
2,2x0,9 (Aerolite CX-Ray) 0,61 N 18,56mm 7,55mm
2,3x1,2 (Aerocomp) 1,15 N 14,22mm 5,08mm
1,8x1,8 2,55 N 7,71mm 7,83mm
1,6x1,6 2,21 N 9,65mm 9,94mm


Already at the beginning of testing we found out that the aero spike has about 4x lower resistance than the classic round, but in terms of strength are different results. Due to its shape, the round tip has roughly the same properties in both measurements. The Aero spike has its advantages primarily in the tensile direction, but loses side load.

These properties practically select spikes into the disciplines for which they are applicable. Aero spikes are best suited for road wheel rims with rim brakes where there is the greatest demand for tensile strength. Due to their lateral rigidity, the round tips are suitable for disc brakes and scooters. (When selecting the spokes, it is also necessary to take into account the rider's weight and cycling level.)

Molded hole technology

technology of formed holes have rims from the DOLOMITY PRO series

Fibers without damaged structure

straightpull vs classic

Distribution of forces in the nipples area

weight limit of the raft

Form hole test results

DOLOMITY PRO rims are not limited by weight limit

Technology Tensile strength Tension spokes Weight limit
Molded holes for nipples 500 kg / f 150 kg 200 kg
Drilled holes for 4D technology nipples 300 kg / f 120 kg 120 kg


The new MTB carbon rims from the DOLOMITY PRO range are not limited by weight due to unique manufacturing technology and molded nipple holes. Up to 60% higher strength than standard rims ensures high durability and complete reliability even in the most demanding terrain.

IDEA WHEEL CONSTRUCTION

design testing of wheel bikes IDEA

Straightpull vs Classic String

straightpull vs classic

4D drilling holes at an angle

weight limit of the raft


Results of wheel design testing

constructionally proven IDEA carbon wheels

String type Deformation
Straightpull 0,0019mm
Classic 0,0255mm


For the long life of the string, the most important thing is the correct entanglement and also the distribution of the applied forces over the entire length of the spike. The new Straigtpull entrainment, in combination with the asymmetric rim, is clearly the most gentle solution for long-life wheel enticing. Thanks to the straight pull of the toe from the hub to the rim, the toe is nowhere to break and the forces are continuously distributed throughout its length. The asymmetric rim, especially on disc brakes, aligns the angles at which the spokes point towards the rim.

The spoke holes in the standard drilled rims are drilled with 4D technology at an exact angle that minimizes any unwanted spike bending.


BRAKE SURFACE TEST TEST

design testing of wheel bikes IDEA

IDEA braking surface test

straightpull vs classic

Brake pad IDEA DIAMOND 280

weight limit of the raft


Results of thermal testing

braking surface with high temperature resistance up to 280 C

Parameter Result
Maximum temperature 210 C
Average temperature 150 C
Maximum performance 1400 watts
Average power 1100 watts
Test duration 100 sec


At gradually increased load from 600 W to 1400 W for 100 seconds, a maximum temperature of 210 degrees Celsius was reached. The braking surface was free from damage and wear after this test. The maximum thermal resistance of the rim was set at 280 degrees Celsius.

This dynamic temperature test of the braking surface shows that the IDEA rims with DIAMOND 280 braking surface are absolutely reliable even for long periods of intensive braking.


CARBON FORMING TECHNOLOGY

automatic fiber laying for maximum accuracy

Machine-precise fiber laying

straightpull vs classic

The rim balance also includes a valve

weight limit of the raft


Results of automated production process

100% accurate and balanced rim with minimal weight

Technology Result
Automated molding 100% accuracy, low weight with 5 g deviation
Manual molding low accuracy, higher weight due to imperfect process, weight deviation 20 g


Automatic fiber laying ensures 100% accuracy, minimizes hidden manufacturing defects and reduces rim weight.

In addition, machine-made rims are perfectly balanced, which improves the handling characteristics of the entire wheel set. During the production was thought of the valve, which throws even the most accurate rims. Therefore, we add several layers of fabric to the part opposite the valve to precisely balance the resulting wheels.